GearGeek – NHL Equipment Database

GearGeek is the world’s first online NHL equipment database.See what every active NHL player is using on the ice right now – sticks, gloves, pants, skates and helmets. You can sort by brands, teams, positions, stat leaders and more.GearGeek is free to …

4 Corners – D vs. O

Drill:1. Place O in each corner with a puck2. D starts in front of net and skates toward one of the O3. When he stops and transitions, the O drives the net and they play 1 on 1 until a score, puck freeze or D clears the puck4. D then picks another O an…

What evaluators look for during try-outs

I’ve been asked a lot over the years what I look for in a player during evaluations.  After watching my son during various AA & AAA Ice try-outs, I’ve been thinking more about this topic and wanted to share a bit of what I look for and some ot…

Recent Articles:

Robo Puck: The future of hockey?

March 26, 2011 Equipment No Comments

By Hockey Player Staff
Oct 29, 2001, 19:25

 

Design by Hoon Chun.

What will hockey equipment be like in the next decade?

To find the answer, we turned to the creative minds at Pasadena’s world famous Art Center College of Design. Art Center graduates have been responsible for designing such cultural icons as the Apple Computer logo, the Mazda Miata, and numerous cuddly little Muppets—among other things—so we figured they’d have an interesting take on puck in the year 2000.

The mission for students of Product Design instructor Gaylord Eckles was to design hockey equipment that was both functional and aesthetically striking. He wanted gear that dared to inject a little personality into the game’s hardware; gear that was “as dynamic as the sport of hockey itself.”

With the assistance of professional advisor and former NHL defenseman Rick Chartraw, the students analyzed current equipment and found some problems to overcome; high weight, bulk, and limited flexibility in some cases, insufficient protection in others. Then they went to work on the future of hockey.

Here’s a sample of what they came up with.

— Alex Carswell

Design by Gregg Luconi.

 

Design by Jason Hurst.

 

Design by Tom Jung.

 

Design by Nam Cho.

 

Design by John Frye and Minho Joo.

 

This first appeared in the 05/1995 issue of Hockey Player Magazine®
© Copyright 1991-2011 Hockey Player® and Hockey Player Magazine®

 

Tactical and strategic differences

March 25, 2011 General No Comments

By Paul Chapey
Oct 29, 2001, 19:21

 

Technically, roller hockey isn’t much different than ice hockey. While we’ve talked about the differences between skating on blades and on wheels, the fact is that shooting, stickhandling, stick checking and most of the other technical hockey skills are the same for roller and ice hockey.

Tactically and strategically, however, roller and ice hockey can be quite different. Here are some effective tactics and strategies for roller hockey—some of which are obviously different than those that work in ice hockey.

Offense

Roller hockey should be played something like European ice hockey. Since roller is played with four skaters and a goaltender, there’s more skating room and generally less congestion. NHL hockey is more linear, with attention to skating lanes. Roller hockey is more a game of wheeling and dealing, weaving, interchanging and curvilinear skating. Quite a bit of man-to-man defense is used in roller hockey, and non-linear skating does a good job of offsetting that kind of coverage.

In ice hockey—particularly the North American game—penetration of the zone is often accomplished by sacrificing possession. A solid roller hockey strategy is to never sacrifice possession. In top-level amateur roller hockey there are no line calls, so it’s much easier to regroup and not risk zone attacks without an offensive numerical advantage. Whacking the puck into what would be the offensive zone is rock-head strategy.

Don’t over pass in roller hockey. If you’re in a bind and need to get rid of the puck, put it on goal. The puck is lighter and easier to shoot quickly in this game. Goaltender is the most challenging position in roller hockey because lateral movement on wheels is difficult. Also, many roller rinks aren’t too well lit, and this adds to the goalie’s disadvantage.

“Lots of shots” is a strategy to remember.

 

Defense

The most effective defensive strategies in roller hockey are man-to-man systems. Zone defenses are loose, and allow for too much shooting. One of the few times that zone coverage is advisable is during the first few shifts of the game; it’s a good idea to see how you match up against the other team. There will be certain match-ups that you’ll have to avoid, and you’ll want to identify them before going man-to-man.

Three-on-twos in roller hockey quite frequently transition into two-on-ones the other way because players fail to do a hockey stop and get back. Players tend to coast around the goal instead, and by the time they get to half floor, the other team has already had a scoring opportunity. If you’re involved offensively in a two-on-one, or any numerical advantage attack, remember to think about getting back quickly if the play is broken up.

One of the golden rules of roller hockey is not to over pursue the offensive puck carrier. Body checking isn’t allowed, and if you skate towards the puck carrier you’re easy to burn. This is poor defense in ice hockey, but in roller it’s an even worse mistake because you just can’t stop and recover as quickly on in-lines as you can on ice.

 

Special Teams

The average roller hockey game is about two 17-minute running time periods. Smart leagues play three minute minor penalties. That means one minor penalty is almost nine percent of the game. It should be obvious that taking a lot of penalties is a fast track to a losing season. In RHI, power play conversion percentages are more than double what they are in the NHL. Combine the goalie disadvantage and the wide open room to move in a four-on-three power play and it’s easy to see that penalty killing is much more difficult in roller hockey.

Your best strategy: cut down on those penalties.

If the other team is going to give you a power play advantage, then you’ve got to seize the opportunity and put the puck in the net. Design a good power play and execute well. One problem I see over and over in power plays is the lack of discipline in setting up. Teams seem to panic, rush and force the puck. There are very few set plays in hockey. But the power play is one of them that can be accomplished with repetitive practice.

Improving your special teams play is the quickest way to get better results on both sides of the scoreboard. If you successfully kill one more penalty per game and convert one more power play each game, that’s a two goal differential. This is particularly important to teams that are competitive, but seem to lose close games.

There’s one aspect of roller hockey and ice hockey where the game plan should be identical: the undetermined possession part of the game, where neither team has the puck. This demands a very simple strategy—get those loose pucks! This is the time to never hold back. If you win every race to a loose puck, it’s yours, and the offensive gates are open It doesn’t get any more basic than that.

 

Paul Chapey is the coach of Team USA and will coach the US in the FIRS World Championships.

This first appeared in the 05/1995 issue of Hockey Player Magazine®
© Copyright 1991-2011 Hockey Player® and Hockey Player Magazine®

 

Tuff-N-Lite: Another Look

March 25, 2011 Video Content No Comments

Another review of the Tuff-N-Lite hockey sock after using it for a few months.

Tuff-N-Lite: Another Look

Here is another look at the Tuff-N-Lite hockey sock. After using it for a few months, Patrick recommends the sock to anyone looking for a comfortable sock that also protects your legs.

When a hook is not a hook

March 24, 2011 General No Comments

By Ken Brody
Oct 23, 2001, 18:27

 

Striper Ken Brody

How often are you watching a hockey game when you see a player fouled, only to have no penalty called by the on-ice official? I’m sure it’s quite often, especially in professional hockey.

Why does this happen? Because calling every infraction isn’t always the best policy. In fact, the best referees are usually those who (we hear it all the time) “let the players play,” and call penalties—not allthe time—but at the right moments.

Why shouldn’t you as a referee whistle down every single “foul” that you see? First of all, even if you try, you cannot possibly see every infraction committed. You only have two eyes, and the ice is simply too big. Second, you could be setting too exacting a standard for yourself—a standard that could well come back to haunt you. If you let even one “questionable” penalty go uncalled, you will anger and confuse the players, and earn the most dangerous tag of all for a referee: inconsistent.

Third, there will just be too many stoppages in play. The game will drag on, and the players (and, at the professional level, the fans) won’t like it.

Everyone—players, coaches and fans—wants the game fairly called, not overly called.

 

What’s the situation?

So if judgment is critical, what are the main criteria for calling penalties? Here are some circumstances and situations where penalties should be called.

• Infractions that have the potential to cause injury, such as cheap shots and blind-side fouls.

• Infractions that prevent potential scoring chances and breakaways.

• Infractions that result in an unfair change of possession.

• Infractions involving interference with and/or checking the goalie in the goal crease.

Those are situations where a penalty is almost always appropriate. There are also some other criteria for calling penalties, but only under certain circumstances. They include:

• Fouls which, left uncalled, continue to build up and create an atmosphere or increase the potential for a more serious situation to arise.

• Fouls involving obscene language and gestures, either to incite an opponent or—more seriously—which is directed towards the official.

• Accidental contact which causes injury, or “dangerous” situations you might observe.

 

What not to call

So if those are examples of what an official should call, what should he or she stay away from? Things like these:

• Incidental contact. A situation where two players are chasing the puck and end up having no place to go but into each other. While there may be extreme or even severe contact, in most cases no penalty is called.

• Minor clutch and grab. A hook, hold, or small (non-violent) slash that is released immediately and does not affect the play.

• Minor flare-ups. A situation where two players push, rough, or low-key slash each other and then separate immediately, allowing the game to go on.

The ref can actually help prevent penalty infractions from occurring if he follows a referee’s credo: Be vocal, be visible. If the players know the ref is watching them in certain situations, and he tells them exactly when to “cut it out,” the hostilities usually cease. Another referee rule, if not quite a credo, is to make sure that the first penalty you call in a game is a good penalty—not a borderline call. It sets the tone for the rest of the contest, and can get players to work either with you or—if it’s a bad call—against you.

 

Be consistent

Another important aspect is to keep one style of refereeing for an entire game, and do not change it in mid-stream. Whether you call the game loose or tight, do it that way for the whole game. Any change of style during a game will confuse and anger everybody—the players, the coaches, and your partner referee.

Angry players take out their frustrations on their opponents, and you will therefore have created a potentially dangerous situation. No one wants to play under these conditions.

The more experience you get, and the better you get to know the tendencies of players in certain game situations (and, likewise, as they get to know your tendencies) the fewer problems and less violence you will have on the playing surface.

If you stick to the principles discussed here, over the long haul you will eventually find yourself having to call fewer penalties. You might even get some respect!

 

Ken Brody has been a referee for ice, floor and roller hockey for 20 years in New York, Illinois, and California.

This first appeared in the 04/1995 issue of Hockey Player Magazine®
© Copyright 1991-2011 Hockey Player® and Hockey Player Magazine®

 

EASTON SPORTS TO HIT THE ROAD ON DREAM CRAZY TOUR

March 23, 2011 Players No Comments

Easton Sports today announced the Dream Crazy Tour, offering baseball, hockey and lacrosse players the chance to be national ambassadors of their sport. Easton is accepting video auditions atwww.easton.com/dreamcrazy until Monday, April 11, 2011.

“We’re looking for people who can truly embody their sport in a way that has never been done before,” said Chris Zimmerman, president of Easton Sports. “This is a once in a lifetime opportunity for entrants to travel the country representing their sport and for Easton to be personified by true sports lovers.”

From April through December, the ambassadors will travel across the U.S. and Canada, discovering, celebrating and sharing the beauty of sport through their eyes. Filming at key sporting events, the group of three will be visiting players, tournaments and families and anything else sport related that they find along the way.

Applicants must submit a short video audition with a maximum length of 1:30 and be willing to be based in the Los Angeles area. Videos can be submitted via YouTube or can be directly uploaded at www.easton.com/dreamcrazy.

For more information, please contact us at HockeyPlayer.com.

About Easton Sports

Easton Sports is a developer, manufacturer, marketer and distributor of baseball, softball, hockey, and lacrosse equipment for both sports professionals and enthusiasts.  Easton Sports focuses on its ability to innovate and create products of unmatched quality and performance including the No. 1 bat in the College World Series®, Women’s College World Series®, Little League World Series®, and Slow-Pitch Softball, as well as the No. 1 stick and No. 1 glove in the National Hockey League.  Headquartered in Van Nuys, Calif., Easton Sports employs more than 1,200 people worldwide and maintains facilities in Utah, California, Mexico, Canada and Asia.  For further information, please visit the company online at www.eastonsports.com.

 

Motivation toolbox

March 23, 2011 Coaches No Comments

By Julia Negro
Oct 23, 2001, 18:19

 

Julia Negro

George Gwozdecky, a NCAA Division I Coach of the Year, believes motivation is the key component for a successful season. And motivation and leadership starts with the coach. Try these tips that Gwozdecky, now in his first year with the University of Denver Pioneers, used to lead his Miami (Ohio) team to the CCHA regular season championship in 1993.

Good coaching habits

Gwozdecky feels that the coach’s practice habits add to the motivation and consistency of a team. A coach has to be confident and consistent in team preparation. Go into the season with a general philosophy about how to play. Don’t change your game plan every weekend just because you are facing a new opponent. Make players realize that each game is equally important, no matter who you are playing.

There are days when your team won’t be perfect, and you can’t blow up and send them off the ice. Expect your team to have some bad days. Gwozdecky believes the best thing to do is talk to your players individually. He tries to talk to each player at least once a week, whether it is for 30 seconds or 30 minutes.

As a coach, if you feel your team is taking the opponent too lightly in practice, do something to make them realize that you aren’t happy with their behavior. You can stop practice and skate them, or just pull them off the ice for the rest of practice. The team should quickly realize that their level of practice intensity has to improve.

 

Accountable players

You also have to hold players accountable for their actions. Gwozdecky finds that one of the quickest ways to motivate players is by using the superstar to set an example. He tells of one of Miami’s star players who didn’t follow the team rules. For a week he made that player change at home or in another part of the ice arena.

The team got a great laugh out of it, but at the same time they knew they were going to be held accountable for certain things. As long as players are held accountable for their actions, they will respect you and understand that you have their best interest in mind.

 

A time to talk

Another tip is to motivate through timely communication. Gwozdecky recalls a particular game where he feels motivation was a key factor in winning. Miami’s first league series in 1992-93 was at Michigan State. Miami had never won in East Lansing before, and it was one of those rinks where the players are in awe and feel afraid or intimidated. Miami was down 3-1 to MSU after the second period. The players came into the locker room and they weren’t happy.

“Before the players entered the locker room after the period, I wrote ‘You Are Intimidated’ on the blackboard,” Gwozdecky said. I don’t know if you could do that to every team, but I knew this team and the older players, and how they would react to that. I came back into the locker room about five minutes after they had a chance to read the blackboard.”

Gwozdecky told them their focus was on the bright lights and MSU rather than on working hard and playing their game. The coach spewed a few other motivating words and the team went out and rallied for a 4-3 win.

They charged into the locker room after the final buzzer and couldn’t wait to erase the blackboard.

“The team expected to be praised, and at that point I was upset with them. We just made a great comeback in a rink that we had never won in and against a team that had a great winning tradition. I talked with the team and told them we wouldn’t have won if it wasn’t for our goaltender. I told the guys that I wouldn’t expect anything less than what they were capable of.

“We played much better (the next) night and consequently won that game also. This was a situation where communication was timely and probably helped us.”

 

Motivate with competition

Try to formulate games within drills, one-on-one competitions, and situations that force the players to work hard but have fun at the same time. Gwozdecky comments: “We’ll give an apple, an orange, or a can of fruit juice to the winning player or group. The guys love to compete even for the silliest things. This really helps with morale on the ice because it’s a competition, not just another drill.”

 

Reinforcement…either way

If positive reinforcement doesn’t work, try negative reinforcement. An example of this would be a player continually making the same mistakes at practice. Gwozdecky says that “every situation is different, so I would approach the problem one step at a time. I would first speak to the captain and let him know that he should inform the player that he needs to pick up his performance in practice. If that doesn’t help, I will speak to the player myself.”

Gwozdecky might say to the player, “You are doing this well, but we need you to start working harder and let’s see you do it. You are capable of this and we expect you to achieve this level of play. If that kind of motivation doesn’t work, then there is nothing wrong with negative reinforcement. For example, I will stop practice and skate the group for 45 seconds. It’s not a long skate but enough for them to get the point.

“Believe me, peer pressure from your teammates is a great motivational tool in itself. I haven’t had to raise my voice at all, but (meanwhile) this player has four of his teammates on his back for the rest of practice. So he works hard.”

 

Rate the troops

Gwozdecky advocates using a rating system on players in practice. If you have the time and resources, a rating players from one to five can possibly point out the team members who may need some extra motivation. At Miami, this was done on a daily basis by the hockey support staff. If you don’t have the staff, (a youth coach) could take notes after practice. Then after three or four practices you may want to review your evaluations. Look for players who are having problems, or lagging, in practice and may need some extra motivation or a talk from their coach.

George Gwozdecky turned around the Miami program in his five years behind the bench. Hopefully some of these tips can help your program become a winner, too.

 

 

Julia Negro is a conditioning instructor at Michigan State University and an Administrator for Huron Hockey School in Traverse City, MI.

This first appeared in the 04/1995 issue of Hockey Player Magazine®
© Copyright 1991-2011 Hockey Player® and Hockey Player Magazine®

 

Backing up strong

March 22, 2011 Hockey Tips No Comments

By Robby Glantz
Oct 23, 2001, 18:17

 

A common myth in hockey, which I hear repeated quite often, is that only defensemen need to be strong backward skaters. While it is true that, overall, a defenseman will skate greater distances backward than the forward, it is still vital that the forward make every attempt to master backward skating techniques.

These days, with the game evolving to feature all five players on both offense and defense, forwards are constantly required to make quick change of direction moves, as well as the controlled backward-to-forward moves needed for new forechecking systems. And besides, all you have to do is watch Wayne Gretzky or Jari Kurri and notice how often they are skating backward. It will become clear that the best players are also the best all-around skaters—and that means in both directions.

The following is a checklist to improve your backward skating stride and crossovers.

 

Backward stride

Here are some key points to concentrate on:

• Bend your knees deeply, so that they are “covering” your toes. Your back should be straight, with your head up and eyes forward.

• Start each push from directly under your body, the most powerful starting point.

• Pivot the heel of the pushing foot up-and-outward so that it is perpendicular to your glide foot (forming an upside down letter “U”).

• Push one foot at a time, using all your weight on each thrust. Be firm.

• The pushing foot drives to the side, to full extension—forming a “C” in the ice—while you glide straight back on the other foot.

• Do not swivel your hips like you are dancing; maintain as direct or straight a line as possible.

• Return each “finished-stride” foot to the middle, under your body, and repeat the exact maneuver with the other foot.

 

Skating imagery

When skating backward, your body posture and positioning is vital. You should feel like you are sitting on a stool with your rear end almost parallel to the ice—keeping your back straight and your weight centered directly over the middle of your skates. Positioning your upper body and chest too far forward while skating backward will put too much weight to the front part of the skate and definitely detract from your balance, speed and power.

 

Backward crossovers

Again, some key points to concentrate on:

• Keep your rear end down, so that it is parallel to the ice, by bending at the knees (with the back, as always) straight.

• You should make one push at a time, using all your body weight centered over each push.

• The outside leg should push a C-cut into the ice, to full extension (see explanation above in Backward Stride).

• The inside leg should pull hard under the body, also to full extension, finishing on the outside edge with a flick of the toe (your legs should form the letter “X”).

• You should then step out as wide as you can with that inside leg so that you have the ability to pull that leg under the body again. This will help you gain more speed.

Skating imagery II

I’ve said it before with forward crossovers, but the same applies here: try to picture this maneuver more as a “crossunder” than as a crossover. Both skates should remain on the ice at all times, with that inside leg constantly pulling under the outside leg.

I like to have my students make believe they are playing tug-of-war with their inside leg. In other words, try to pull against as much ice as possible until you have fully stretched the inside leg—in effect, “tugging” against the ice.

And finally, remember to bend your knees so they are about two inches over the toes of your skates. This will allow you to stretch your legs to the maximum, and it will give you much improved balance and control.

 

Robby Glantz, power skating coach for the Los Angeles Kings, Swedish champions Malmö, and the German National Teams, conducts skating programs throughout North America and Europe.

This first appeared in the 04/1995 issue of Hockey Player Magazine®
© Copyright 1991-2011 Hockey Player® and Hockey Player Magazine®

 

On defense with Chris Pronger

March 21, 2011 Interviews, Players No Comments

By Bob Cunningham
Oct 23, 2001, 18:14

 

Chris Pronger was the second player taken in the 1993 NHL Draft, mainly because the Hartford Whalers felt the 6’6”, 215-pounder had the tools to become another Paul Coffey.

At Peterborough, Pronger tore up the Ontario Hockey League, tallying 139 points in 125 Major Junior games. And with his extraordinary size, the Whalers believed they had the type of player who could dominate at both ends of the ice.

But Pronger is human. He entered the NHL last season and, by his own admission, was less than himself in his first few weeks at hockey’s highest level. He knew he belonged in the NHL, but simultaneously believed he needed to crawl before walking.

“I was a little hesitant because I didn’t know what to expect,” says Pronger, who indicated that his reluctance to showcase his own skills caused him to endure a less-than-ideal first half of his rookie campaign. “Once I started to relax, I began to play better.”

The common error many young defensemen, and even some forwards, make is to play scared. Rather than concentrating on aspects of the game that will help their team win games, these intimidated youngsters work instead at avoiding stupid mistakes that lead to losing.

It applies at any jump in level, whether it be from Juniors to the NHL or from the 10-and-11 year-old division to the 12-to-13 class.

 

Confidence a “must”

“You don’t want to be cocky, but you definitely have to be confident in what you’re doing out there,” Pronger says. “When you’re a young player, or a rookie, bad games are a given. What you have to do is learn how to work your way through it.”

Pronger played in 81 games last season, amassing 30 points along with 113 penalty minutes. Those numbers are certainly nothing to be ashamed of, but Pronger knows he’s capable of much higher production. And he entered his sophomore season bent on reaching the level Whalers management had in mind when they picked him ahead of Paul Kariya and Jason Arnott, among other promising youngsters.

“I believe your first priority should be to take care of your own end first,” he says. “But when the (scoring) opportunities are there, you have to go after them. In my rookie year, I didn’t feel as confident as I would have liked on the offensive end. There was no reason for me to think that way.”

Still, Pronger did have a positive effect on his new team. The Whalers allowed almost 60 fewer goals last season than they did in 1992-93.

“I did a lot of work on the basics. I worked hard to help out at both ends, especially in the second half of the season,” he recalls. “I worked a lot on foot speed.”

The frantic pace of the NHL leaves most rookies in awe. Pronger said that he thought he had a grasp of the Bigs until he played in his first NHL game.

“Not only is the tempo so much faster, but everybody gives 110 percent on every shift of every game,” he says.

That’s a feeling most players experience whenever they’re promoted to a new level of the game; it’s not a scenario that’s restricted to the NHL.

“It’s kind of like a little cycle,” Pronger adds. “You reach a level and there comes a point where you can take a shift off now and then and it won’t hurt you. Then you go to the next level and you realize you can’t do that.”

 

Size vs. smarts

Pronger’s game is often keyed by using his size, but he feels that playing smart is much more important than playing big.

“Size has some advantages. Being a rookie, I used my size to help out sometimes,” he says. “I could use my reach to poke check the puck away if I got beat to the side. I mean, you’re not very often going to run a big guy over.

“But playing smart is what you have to do. Get in the right position to begin with, and that guy won’t get around you. Then you don’t have to rely on your reach.”

Another trait Pronger says aids in the “breaking-in” period for a young defenseman is intensity. Pronger cautions against all-out aggression, and is instead in favor of a win-or-nothing approach. Winning, says Pronger, is always the most important thing—at any level.

“I’ve never been too happy when we lost. If we don’t win, I’m not a good guy to be around. Sometimes, that doesn’t win you too many friends.”

It’s a tough balance to maintain—keeping the intensity to win while understanding that a level head is required to effectively contribute to the team despite a lack of experience. And to balance aggression with intelligence.

And it can be murder defensively, where individual mistakes always seem to catch the spotlight. With forwards, the play is more team-oriented. Mistakes result in missed opportunities—which is preferable to outright goals against.

But by the looks of things, Pronger’s all-out approach to winning should carry him through this difficult period of adjustment.

— Bob Cunningham

This first appeared in the 04/1995 issue of Hockey Player Magazine®
© Copyright 1991-2011 Hockey Player® and Hockey Player Magazine®

 

The perfect skating surface

March 20, 2011 General No Comments

By Wayne Anderson
In the ever-expanding world of roller hockey, we’re not only still looking for the perfect wheel and the perfect puck, we’re also looking for that perfect skating surface. Of the several different types of surfaces out there, each has advantages and disadvantages. And a critical part of evaluating a surface is taking into consideration the environment in which the surface will be set.

Is the rink outside or inside? In a climate-controlled environment? Is it partially covered? Is it a partial-use setting, as in an ice rink melted for summer? All these factors can make or break even the best surfaces if they are not designed for use in that specific environment.

What’s out there?

The most skated-on surface is probably asphalt, commonly called “blacktop.” Blacktop covers streets, parking lots and schoolyards across North America. Its major advantages are that it is fairly inexpensive, it holds up well even in harsh climates, and the wheels that come with most in-line skates work well on it.

The major disadvantage is that the surface is fairly rough. Because of that, a hockey ball is the most effective thing to use; few manufactured pucks actually work well on blacktop. Another disadvantage is that, being mainly an outdoor surface, blacktop softens up when Mother Nature turns up the heat.

Another frequently skated-on surface is smooth cement. If your summer roller rink is an ice rink in winter, you’re probably skating on this type of surface. It is not the same type of cement that your sidewalk is made of; it is smoother, looks polished, and is often painted. Because it is so smooth, most pucks work very well on this surface.

The major problem with smooth cement is that over time it tends to crack. Once cracked, it is almost impossible to repair it well enough to play roller hockey on. Therefore, it eventually needs to be overlaid with another roller surface.

One word of advice: Plastics

Over the last year, plastic tile has become a very popular surface for indoor use. With an interlocking tile system, large areas of play can be laid down and taken up fairly easily. Some of these systems go by the trade names Sport Court and Mateflex. The tiles come in various colors, so your lines and circle can be laid right down instead of taped or painted on the surface, and the puck slides extremely well on this type of surface. Also, plastic tile is considered a “safety floor,” which sits well with most insurance companies.

On the down side, this mainly-indoor surface is fickle, and reacts to any change in atmospheric conditions. If there is the slightest change in humidity, you might want to bring your blades rather than your wheels! Another negative—though easily overcome—is that most skaters will want to buy a special set of wheels designed for this surface. Hyper, Bullzeye and Labeda all make a “Sport Court” wheel. Plus, for rink operators, this type of surface system is fairly expensive.

The other surface that has gained popularity recently is a so-called “coating” surface, such as “Roll On” and some tennis court surfaces. There are several different types of these surfaces with textures ranging from gritty to smooth. The surface is fairly “grippy” for your wheels, but the puck action often seems to be slow. And, once again, the surface’s worst enemy is moisture; rain or high humidity will postpone any play until the surface has completely dried.

However, most roll on surfaces are non-porous—and that means water will sit on top, making it easy to squeegee or sponge away the problem. A tennis or outdoor basketball court material will probably be slightly porous, and present some of the wet-tile problems discussed earlier.

Flooring expert Bob Brooks recently told me of a new, scientifically-developed product called “Roller Ice” on which you can actually adjust the skid coefficient. Conversely, with standard “alathetic urethane” (roll-on) coatings, the skid coefficient is fixed, and you’re stuck with whatever you get. But on this new surface, which has excellent puck action and wheel grip, you can tailor the skid factor to your liking.

The nemesis remains

Roller Ice is also multi-layered, with an undercoating that can be colored and can contain lines, advertising, etc., and a top “ice” coating that really does look—and skate—like ice. Once again, however, the moisture nemesis must be addressed.

In the save-the-best-for-last department, we’ll look at a surface that has withstood the test of time: the hardwood floor. That’s right, good old Canadian (or Vermont, if you prefer) Maple. This traditional surface is probably the most forgiving, and the most adaptable, to the varying hardness (durometer rating) of wheels. The major disadvantage, and probably the only one, is cost. Prime lumber is expensive, and most new rinks cannot afford the price tag associated with this type of floors.

Even some existing roller rinks that are being retrofitted into hockey rinks and already have these floors in place face cost dilemmas: upkeep is expensive. However, if maintenance is done correctly, the floor can last forever. There are rinks out there with 50- or 60-year-old hardwood floors still going strong. And even the dreaded moisture monster doesn’t seem to be as much of a problem with hardwood, although standing water (a leaky goalie water bottle) can present a small problem.

Whatever surface you do skate on, the most important thing is to skate safe. So until next month, keep on rolling!

Wayne Anderson is Managing Director of Huron Hockey’s roller hockey schools based in Matawan NJ.

This first appeared in the 04/1995 issue of Hockey Player Magazine®
© Copyright 1991-2011 Hockey Player® and Hockey Player Magazine®